Lifestyle medications are now affordable. What does this mean? First, you need to
understand what a lifestyle medication is. Your insurance company
understands what a lifestyle drug is because they will not reimburse you for any of
it. A lifestyle drug is one that is deemed to improve your way of
living, or lifestyle, but is not necessary to cure or reduce the
symptoms of any life threatening disease or sickness. Great examples of
lifestyle drugs are Viagra, Levitra, Cialis, Propecia and Acomplia.
Viagra, Cialis and Levitra are prescribed to cure erectile dysfunction.
These are definitely lifestyle drugs. They are not necessary for
survival but will most definitely improve the quality of your life... sex
life that is. Propecia is the most popular medication used for the
treatment of male pattern baldness. Propecia is also a lifestyle drug
because there is nothing life threatening about baldness, even though
some men would tend to disagree, me included. Acomplia is the new
breakthrough drug highly praised in European countries for weight loss.
Acomplia, generic name Rimonabant, helps you to lose weight by reducing your
appetite. If your brain tells you to eat less, then you will consume
less food and lose weight. The problem with all these medications is
threefold. First, insurance companies do not like to pay for them.
Second, they are protected by patents and are extremely expensive.
Third, even though the need is self diagnosed, they require a doctor’s
prescription to obtain these drugs.
Why are these medications so expensive? Well, Pfizer would state that
Viagra is so expensive because we, the consumer, need to pay for the
research and development of that drug. (Even though all research and
development is completed by the time the drug reaches market.) I find
that response curious. Who pays for the 20 Viagra commercials that are
played during each and every NFL football game? Who pays for the Viagra
NASCAR sponsorship? Who pays for the full page Viagra ads in the popular
magazines such as Men’s Health or Sports Illustrated? Us, the consumers
pay for all the media that Pfizer uses to convince us that we have a
medical condition requiring their medication.
I previously used to lie in bed at night, unable to sleep, and blamed it
on a stressful day and would get up and watch some TV until I was tired
enough to fall asleep. Now, thanks to modern medication and TV advertising, I
realize that I have insomnia and need the Lunesta butterfly to lull me
to sleep. Or, could it be those restless legs that are keeping me awake.
They are moving around a lot. That could mean “restless legs syndrome”.
Restless legs, are you kidding me? Is this a real diagnosis? Who thinks
of this stuff? Obviously it is because there is big money to be made in
convincing us we have a medical condition requiring a particular
medication. When a pharmaceutical company develops a new drug, they
usually receive a 10-13 year patent. This means that no other drug
company can reproduce that drug, not even in a generic form. To
pharmaceutical companies this means 10-13 years of exclusivity and price
gouging.
How do we battle price gouging? We go to the internet and search for
reputable online pharmacies from other countries that are not tied down
by the USA’s stringent patent laws. A couple of websites that I have
located are delivering authentic generic versions of highly popular
medications at up to 90% off retail prices and do not require existing
prescriptions. These sites are
http://www.4rx.net and http://www.xlpharmacy.net. I have ordered several medications
from both sites and have always received factory sealed medications in a
timely fashion. I have always been impressed with the quality of the
medications and the customer service if I have questions or problems.
How do these sites sell the same medication so cheap? Well, you will
never see a full page color ad for 4Rx in a major magazine. You will
never see an XL Pharmacy NASCAR racecar making laps around the track.
You will never see 30 ad spots for online pharmacies during football
games or the Superbowl. They only produce an honest product and request
an honest dollar in exchange.
Am I the only one that smelled a rat when Claritin just recently
outlived its patent and suddenly became available “Over the counter at
the same prescription strength”? Why was it not “over the counter” the
entire time? Because they can demand a higher price as a prescription
medication and insurance companies will not pay for over the counter
medications. End result is these giant pharmaceutical companies are
ripping off the insurance companies, who in turn need to charge us
higher premiums to make a profit. And we get mad at the insurance
companies. Are we mad at the right people? I should say NOT! This “rat”
returned when Zyrtec outlived its patent. Yep, you guessed it! Now
available over the counter at a new reduced price and the same
prescription strength.
Before you vote the next politician into office that claims Internet
pharmacies are bad and need to be outlawed. Question which companies
were MAJOR supporters in his/her political campaign. I would wager a bet
that it is one of the major pharmaceutical companies. They are actively
involved in all political fundraising events. Fight for your right to
save money. Fight for legitimate Internet pharmacies such as
4rx
and XL Pharmacy
Plasma TV vs
LCD
TV vs
DLP
TV Which big
screen TV is better ???
QUICK
ANSWER: Under 40
inches, LCD , Over 42 go
for plasma tv
LONG
ANSWER
There is
a lot of confusion and
misleading information
available on
Plasma tv's,
LCD tv's and
DLP Tv's
Everyone and anybody you
talk to claims to have
the answer and they are
always bias depending on
what the store wants to
move or what their
factory makes. The truth
is that each has
advantages and
disadvantage depending
on your use.
Please
note: in this we discuss
name brand and no name .
Please don't be fooled
by the fact it may come
from a well known
computer maker, It will
still be considered "no
name". We consider name
brand plasma screens as
NEC, Pioneer, Hitachi ,
LG/Zenith, Panasonic,
Samsung and secondary
name brands ( based on
name brand chassis) such
as JVC,, Sony, Philips,
Mitsubishi, Toshiba,
"No
names" include but are
not limited to Maxcent,
Norcent, Sampo, Gateway,
Monovision, SVA and a
pile more that you have
never heard of and are
usually Chinese based.
NOTE:
LCD
TV refers to a LCD flat
panel,
DLP
TV also
includes DILA and LCD
video projector based
rear projection tvs.
This
chart shows a very
simplified summary,
Please refer to more
detailed explanations
below
LCD up
to 40 inch plasma above
40, use screen saver or
screen wipe
Plasma
screen, Use saver or
screen wipe
*See note
1
Note 1:
Although in long run
Plasma screens are
economically best
choice, Lower initial
outlay on DLP TV in 60
inch plus area may be
attractive, please
consider operating
costs, see more below
Note
2: If you are using the
plasma for digital
signage such as Airport
Terminals arrivals
signs, the image
retention will not be a
factor until you plan on
using the screen for a
different application.
One
problem with LCD tv
screens is that they
have a inherent
delay problem. This
is something that
cannot be overcome.
" It is the nature
of the beast" When
a fast moving object
moves across a LCD
screen the delay of
LCD technology
causes "artifacting"
Basically there are
trails or blockiness
of the image since
the screen cannot
keep up. There are
newer LCD panels
that have lower m/s
( millisecond) times
but there still is a
delay. The good
news is that with a
good name brand LCD
tv the artifacting
is minimal and
really wont be
noticeable until you
get a screen over 30
or 35 inches. At
that point the
delays will be
noticeable and in
some cases extremely
annoying. Expect
severe artifacting
on "no name" units
to the point of
making the tv
basically
unwatchable .
Black
levels: A LCD
display has a
backlight which
shines through the
lcd panels. The
panels allow or
block light
depending on what is
required to produce
an image or a color.
Most , if not all,
LCD tv's tend to
have difficulty
going fully
"black". Blacks
tend to have a very
very dark grey.
This is especially
true on no name
units.
Field
Of Vision: Even the
best LCD tv has
field of vision
problems. When you
look straight on the
picture looks great,
as you move to
either side the
picture quality
diminishes and
eventually
disappears. Some
LCD
tv makers claim up
to 170o
field of view. This
is a complete lie.
To quote one major
manufacturer " well
it doesn't mean you
have a great picture
for 170 degrees, but
you do have a
picture" .
Realistically a good
LCD tv such as a
Sharp Aquos will
have a a 90 degree
(45 each side)
usable picture.
Single Usage: There
are many LCD screens
on the market but
very few have good
video processing. If
a LCD screen is made
as a computer
monitor, it is
usually very poor as
a video display. If
you are planning to
use the unit as a tv,
do not buy a
computer monitor
with a tuner
upgrade. Stick to a
unit designed for
video such as a
Sharp Aquos. For
dual purpose, buy a
lcd tv with a
computer input, not
a computer screen
with a tuner
Extremely expensive
over 35 inch,
Unbelievable amounts
of no name junk
units on market.
Stick to name brands
with proper
warranties
16/9
widescreen units
expensive
Cheaper no name LCD
tv's have very poor
picture quality and
generally poor video
performance
Pixel
failure: This can be
a problem with no
name LCD screens.
All the major brands
have pixel policies
which may allow one
or two dead pixels.
These are not
noticeable unless
you are right in
front of the screen.
A 20 inch lcd screen
has over 300,000
pixels. so one or
two dead could not
be seen. No name lcd
screens have
extremely poor
policies which can
allow higher then
10%. This would make
the unit
unwatchable.
Digital looking
picture: Many LCD
screens tend to have
a "digital look " to
the image and
therefore don't seem
to reproduce colors
naturally.
Good
for still images
such as computer
display, Fairly
reasonable pricing
below 30 inches.
Quality units have
good brightness
levels
No
real estate: A LCD
tv screen hangs on a
wall and takes as
little space as a
picture.
Low
operating cost per
hour ( over 35 inch
extremely expensive
acquisition cost)
Long
Life. Expect 30 to
50,000 hours bulb
life according to
Sharp ( Please note
that the picture can
fade over time on a
LCD TV. I would
expect prime
performance to last
closer to 20 to
30,000 hours maximum
( 13 years at 6
hours per day).
Expect substantially
less on a no name.
Image retention:
NOTE : THE NEWER
PLASMA SCREENS ARE
ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE TO
BURN:
Plasma screens can
suffer image
retention ( burn in)
if a still image is
left on the display
for a extended
period of time. For
example, you would
not want to use a
plasma screen for a
computer display
constantly. If you
were to use a
plasma tv for
Video Display and
occasional use it
for computer, burn
in would not be a
factor. Also if you
were to leave the
plasma tv screen
on a station such as
CNBC, which has
constant ticker tape
across the bottom,
for 24 hours a day,
there would be
noticeable burn in
when you switched to
a different channel.
If by error you were
to burn your screen,
proper name brand
plasma screens do
have a "white flash"
utility which
eliminates the burn,
however it will
shorten the life of
the plasma. If your
primary use of the
plasma screen is for
TV viewing and dvd,
image retention will
not be a factor.
Size:
Plasma screens are
not available below
37 inches. Also
60 inch and above
can be very pricey
but prices are
coming down. For
example a Zenith 60
is below 5000 now.
We recently
purchased a 60"
Pioneer Pure Vision
online for $3250 and
it was delivered as
promised.
No
tuners: Most
plasma screens do not have
tuners and if they
do they are
expensive upgrades.
Some cheaper plasma tv's have optional
tuners however they
usually are not the
best. This is not a
disadvantage in most
cases. Almost
everyone who can
afford a plasma will
be using satellite,
digital cable or
external HD boxes.
So the built in
tuner would be
redundant and a
waste of money.
Many
no name junk units
on market. Stick to
name brands.
Pixel
failure: This can be
a problem with no
name plasma screens.
All the major brands
have pixel policies
which may allow one
or two dead pixels.
These are not
noticeable unless
you are right in
front of the screen.
A 50 inch screen has
over 983,000
pixels. so one or
two dead could not
be seen. No name
plasma screens have
extremely poor
policies which can
allow higher then
10%. This would make
the unit
unwatchable. If the
plasma screen has a
orbiter function,
this will greatly
reduce the chance of
pixel failure. We
have sold tens of
thousands of Plasma
tv screens and can
count the number of
units which we have
had pixel problems
with on one hand. It
should be noted we
do not sell no name
units.
Early
models had poor
contrast. the first
generation plasma tv
screens had poor
contrast and
brightness. Do not
buy a used plasma
screen from a online
auction such as
Ebay. The units that
have been out for
the last two years
outperform the older
units by miles.
Long
life: the average
name brand plasma tv
will last 50 to
70,000 hours to half
life ( brightness is
50% of original, it
will still be 2 to 3
times brighter then
a regular tv) This
is around 20 years
at 6 hours per day.
Expect substantially
less on a no name
Field
of vision: A plasma
screen tv has a
field of vision of
almost 180 degrees
without loss of
picture quality.
From any angle you
will have a great
picture
Brightness: Plasma
screens are very
bright. 4 to 5 times
brighter then an
average tv.
Great
contrast: The last
two generations (
two years or so) of
name brand Plasma
screens have great
contrast ratios.
Look for a rating of
1000 to 1 or more
Please note: certain
manufacturers claim
levels of 3 or 4000
to 1, That is a
false rating and is
achieved by using
non standard
measurement methods.
UPDATE : MOST
MANUFACTURERS ARE
NOW 3000 PLUS.
Low
operating cost: A
name brand plasma is
cheap to operate due
to long life with
virtually no
maintenance ( No you
cannot recharge a
plasma, and they
don't leak gas). The
cost of a nice EDTV
42 inch is well
below 1.5 k and a 50
inch is around 2k.
60 inch plus are
still highly priced
per inch. This is
substantially less
then a LCD TV. 42
inch plasma tv
screens cost almost
half of a 40 inch
lcd.
Instantaneous
picture response:
There is virtually
no delay in any name
brand plasma and
therefore no
artifacting that is
experienced on LCD
screens.
Natural looking
picture: A plasma
screen reproduces a
picture in a similar
manner to a standard
tv .Name brand
plasma tv colors
tend to be natural
looking and more
accurate. Mo names
can tend to be weak
or soft on colors.
No
real estate: A
plasma screen hangs
on a wall and takes
as little space as a
picture
.
Wide
screen, All but one
or two plasma tv
screens are 16:9
wide screen. format
Upgradeability: Many
plasma screens have
upgradeable video
cards that "future
proof " your plasma
High
operational costs:
The dlp tv is simply
a DLP video
projector in a box.
The projectors use a
replaceable bulb
which can cost
between 200 to 400
US dollars. The life
on the bulb varies
but generally expect
around 6 to 8000
hours. However some
will last
substantially less.
Realistically you
can expect to be
buying a bulb every
2 years and possible
sooner if you watch
a lot of tv. Add the
acquisition cost of
the unit and a DLP
tv can actually cost
twice as much as a
plasma over 5 or 6
years of normal use.
In the expected life
of a unit it can
cost 3 to 4 times as
much as a plasma.
Consider a DLP tv
like a computer
bubble jet printer.
Cheaper to acquire,
way more expensive
on ink UPDATE:
SEVERAL DLP
MANUFACTURERS ARE
LOSING BULBS AT 2 TO
3000 HOURS
Example
based on 10 hours a day
use. DLP costs become
even more expensive if
your viewing is more
then 10 hours a day
Cost of
42 inch NEC plasma
2500. Additional costs
over 10 years 0 Plasma
costs per year for 10
years $250 Cost per
year for 15 years $ 166
42 inch
DLP TV 2000. Cost of
bulbs based on 6000 hour
life. 300 per bulb (
this presumes bulb makes
full life) $1825 Yearly
of cost of
DLP tv based
on 10 years 382.50
Average cost over 15
years $315
(not factoring
increasing costs of
bulbs due to inflation)
Large
foot print: Even
though a
DLPtv is
substantially
thinner then a old
style rear
projection tv, they
are still a minimum
of 12 to 13 inches
deep
.
Not
wall mountable:
units cannot be hung
on wall
Field
of vision. Although
greatly improving,
DLPtvs still do not
have as good of a
field of vision as a
plasma tv
Picture quality.
Although improving,
the picture quality
varies on DLP tvs.
Some have very poor
to medium quality,
none have
spectacular. Many
people still
complain about
artifacting and
blockiness in some
units
Diminishing bulb
brightness: When a
bulb gets older in a
dlp Tv the
brightness level
reduces. When the
bulb is replaced,
the tv becomes
bright again.
Early
bulb failure: The
bulb in a DLP can
fail instantly well
before its scheduled
replacement.
Availability of
replacement bulbs
very with
manufacturer. If you
do purchase a DLP tv
I would suggest
getting a spare bulb
right away. Its
murphy's law that
the bulb will fail 3
minutes before the
Superbowl kick off.
UPDATE: Several DLP
manufacturers are
starting to see
their units
requiring new bulbs
below the 2000 hour
mark.!!!!!
Initially low
acquisition cost.
Generally offset by
high operating
costs. Still
cheaper then a
plasma or LCD in the
very large size, 42
to 50 are not much
cheaper then a
plasma screen and
definitely not
cheaper over the
long term.